Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(52)
-
▼
December
(33)
- *sigh*
- Computery Art
- GO AHEAD
- One Ton of Fanmail Pellet Fuel
- The Bird is Away
- Philadelphia man shot because family talked during...
- Nostalgia is a Seductive Liar
- Yes, but what KIND of diapers?
- Don't Cry For Me Armenia
- This kid is exactly like what I think Halo Apes lo...
- Anti-kidnapping expert kidnapped in Mexico
- Me is sexy too, Bander?
- Now Then!
- what is it
- This has its moments...
- Somebody's Day...
- Antartica: Derelict Paradise
- Ain't nothin' but a peanut
- Most Awesomest Failblog Ever
- worst interface EVAR
- +1 Astute!
- It's where we stack the catz.
- It's Not
- DID SOMEONE SAY STARCHILD????????
- I Am The Reason...
- I Know It's Been Out a While...
- Revised Roll Call (now with added Kuru)
- This is Where I Fag Myself Up Bigtime
- Favorites
- For Reals
- So Mumps does This Thing Now...
- movie sign!
- So Awesome
-
▼
December
(33)
4 comments:
I think it's more the implication of feeble-mindedness.
Almost all of our hard-wiring points us toward selecting mates of good health "strenth." Does this predilection on my part suggest some kind of deeply-rooted psychological impulse to go for what is "attainable?"
It indicates that you're also a genetic dead end, so that your brain points you to other flawed and useless creatures of your own type.
It's a way of keeping the gene pool progressing.
that's wot I thought!
Post a Comment